Posted by: Doc T | September 13, 2011

Superheroes, Myth, Genre: Week 3

This week we’re considering Rushing & Frentz’s “Mythic Perspective” and Peter Coogan’s “Superhero Genre” approach, which make for an interesting contrast. While Rushing & Frentz have us reflecting upon how we can find and make meaning from these tutelary archetypes, Coogan argues for Mission, Powers, and Identity (and Supervillains) as unique and distinguishing literary elements of superhero narratives (with notable challenge by Henry Jenkins to his historical typology).

Our comic of the week is 1979’s X-MEN: THE DARK PHOENIX SAGA, a Marvel epic that raises fascinating issues about Superheroines and superpowers, the lines between superhero and supervillain, and X-Men editor Jim Shooter’s intervention into the ending of this now-classic tale! Be sure to follow the ‘comments’ section in the above link for discussion questions!

EXTRA BONUS: MoreFun Tim’s Soapbox!!

Posted by: Doc T | September 8, 2011

Paper #1: Your Superhero History

In class we’ve discussed the origins of the American Superhero genre and looked at some of the ways in which the idea of the superhero appears, reappears, changes, and develops over time.  It’s perhaps easy to contend that these fictional superheroes from popular culture [esp. Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Spider-Man, & Captain America] have become Mythic cultural ICONS—symbols that take on a special, cultural significance as representations for American identity… that these popular, readily-recognizable symbols express something important about American ideas, perspectives, beliefs and values.  But what do they reveal about YOU?

SO…your task is to write a short 5-7 page paper that identifies and explores your Superhero icon through the “Mythic Perspective” of Rushing and Frentz.  What superheroes have been most meaningful to you, and how or why do you identify with them?  What characteristics and values make some character(s) your favorite and what did you learn from them?  If you had to pick a favorite superhero icon, who would it be? As a paper, your discussion should be informed by ideas and concepts from course readings thus far.  That is, drawing upon ideas discussed in class and gleaned from the course readings, identify the central mythic values and culturetypal fantasy themes which your Superhero Icon symbolizes.

Once you’ve chosen your icon, work through your ideas in a series of steps that should all become part of your paper:

1)  Do some research using on-line resources and/or traditional library work.  What is your superhero’s history, from first appearance to various iterations? What have commentators, creators, or experts observed about your icon’s ‘meaning’ for themselves or audiences?  Be sure to keep a careful record of what you found and where you found it (you will need a works cited bibliography at the end of your paper) and be sure when you write to let readers know which your original ideas are and which you have borrowed from your sources.  Find at least FIVE good sources—be sure to cite your sources using proper Chicago-style or MLA citation format.

2)  Briefly describe your earliest or most influential icon for readers who may not be familiar with it.  Try to be as concise as possible with your description, perhaps even using an outside source.  Include a picture on your title page!!

3)  Reflect upon what significance/use superheroes have had for you personally.  Which ‘version’ did you encounter early, and why was this character(s) memorable? What was so appealing about him/her?

4)  Next, try to extend your analysis one step further—Why do you think your superhero has staying power or enduring potential as an ICON?  Will your superhero become one of those American popular culture items/artifacts that will stand the test of time as a MYTHIC icon (i.e. Doty’s defining functions)?  What archetypes can you distinguish as influences? How does your superhero size-up with Reynolds and Coogan’s criteria?

5)  Finally–What does your icon say about America and American identity?  How is it connected to powerful American values?  Is your superhero a variation of archetypal predecessors?  Why is this superhero significant to you? What does your choice say about who you are and what you value? Here is where you interrogate the deeper social values and mythic truths within your superhero’s story.

Remember, the primary goal of this assignment is to demonstrate your grasp of the readings in rhetorical criticism and offer an application of concepts.  The better papers will be thoughtful and analytical rather than merely descriptive — that is, they will get below the surface to address some of the deeper issues and significances of your topic.  The paper is due in-class on the syllabus due date.

Posted by: Doc T | September 5, 2011

The Superhero’s Journey: Week 2

Green Lantern gets another lecture from Green Arrow…

If the Superhero’s Mythic Journey has a formulaic archetypal plot and structure, then the culturetype variations of particular iterations are often telling markers for specific cultural conflicts, struggles, and crisis of an era. When superhero comics strive for cultural relevance, it can tell stories about timely events yet also risk seeming ‘dated‘ to future generations. One such snapshot is 1970’s GREEN LANTERN / GREEN ARROW from the Vietnam-era, a bold and widely-acclaimed run that we’ll be considering for week two. As we continue to survey approaches to understanding Superhero Mythology, we will also be contemplating the narrative reasoning at work within these mythic epics.

UPDATE: ChartPorn on who owns our myths and legends! And Comics Alliance weighs in on Morrison’s “new” Superman in Action Comics!

Posted by: Doc T | August 31, 2011

Superhero Mythology & Origins: Week 1

“Every lover of myth is in a sense the lover of wisdom.” ~Aristotle

One might fairly wonder if superheroes are indeed mythology or not, and there is plenty of room to debate the relative merits of categorization. For now, it may be enough to engage a useful understanding of mythology put forth by William Doty:

The very definition of myth is problematic today; here narrow, partial, “monomythic” definitions are rejected in favor of a complex, inclusive one, the seventeen items of which are then discussed. A mythological corpus consists of a network of myths, which are culturally-important imaginal stories conveying, by means of metaphor and symbol, graphic imagery, and emotional conviction and participation, the primal, foundational accounts of the real, experienced world, and humankind’s roles and relative statuses within it. Mythologies may convey the political and moral values of a culture, and provide systems of interpreting individual experience within a universal perspective, which may include the intervention of suprahuman entities, as well as aspects of the natural and cultural orders. Myths may be enacted or reflected in rituals, ceremonies, and dramas, or provide materials for secondary elaborations. Only a polyphasic definition will provide appreciation of their manifold roles within a society. [Mythography, 2000]

Simply put, mythology performs a plethora of rhetorical and socio-cultural functions besides ‘mere’ entertainment. On the one hand we can examine some (mono)mythic archetype for patterns of structural consistencies and recurring themes or formula across cultures or over time, as Joseph Campbell does in The Hero With A Thousand Faces: “A hero ventures forth from the world of common day into a region of supernatural wonder: fabulous forces are there encountered and a decisive victory is won: the hero comes back from this mysterious adventure with the power to bestow boons on his fellow man.” This separation/ initiation/ return formula, Campbell argues following Jung, is a nigh-universal pattern for myth. On the other hand, we might attend to the telling variations of a tale to examine the distinct fantasy culturetype that conveys new meanings or values for some specific people, time, place, and context. This tension between formulaic convention and innovation (and the conservative versus progressive rhetorical functions of mythic fantasy) is nowhere more clearly illustrated than in the superhero’s origin story.

publicity ad for 1987’s BATMAN: YEAR ONE

The Batman is a particularly fascinating example of just how much narrative flexibility a mythic corpus can exhibit. In fact, it’s almost impossible to even speak of THE Bat-Man when there have been so many BatmanS over time, and I’m not just talking about the movies. In the early days, Batman carried a gun and had little problem dealing death to evil-doers but it wasn’t long before he traded his gat for a sidekick and acted more like a benevolent scout-leader than a grim avenger.  BATMAN: YEAR ONE is Frank Miller‘s turn at RetroActive Continuity or RetCon, a re-telling of the characters origins, motivation, and methods. Here are some discussion questions on B:Y1 that we’ll explore together in class as we delve into the MYTHIC RHETORICAL PERSPECTIVE of Rushing & Frentz. A central issue that will emerge: What tensions result from the superhero’s status as a “commodified myth,” and what important cultural beliefs and American values are on display within these tutelary archetypes?

Posted by: Doc T | August 25, 2011

4849 Fall 2011

Welcome to the SUPERHERO RHETORIC FORTRESS OF BLOGITUDE, the official website for Professor Shaun Treat’s COMM 4849 Mythic Rhetoric of the American Superhero course blog.

Offered at the University of North Texas by the Dept. of Communication Studies, this course explores comic superheroes as culture, commodity, and unique allegorical expression of America’s identity and cultural values.

Sound deep?  You bet, but it’ll also be a heckuva lot of fun.  Superfriends welcome!

The course reading packet will be available at CopyPro (on the corner of Frye and Hickory) on Friday afternoon, and you can grab course comics at MoreFun Comics & Games on the Denton Square, but meanwhile, here are more SuperReadings!

A Brief History of Comics and the Superhero

Does America worship superheroes?

Campbell, “A Rhetorical Perspective

Brummett, “Rhetorical Methods in Critical Studies”

Comic of the Week: “RetCon” and BATMAN: YEAR ONE!

Posted by: Doc T | August 10, 2011

The Ultimate Race Experiment with Spider-Man

The MYTHIC RHETORIC OF SUPERHEROES course (Comm 4849 Special Topics in Rhetoric, TuTh 9:30-10:50a) is coming back to UNT this fall! Tell your friends and register soon, seats go fast! And a very special shout-out to class superscholar April Murphy for her impressive ComicCon 2011 presentation on Wonder Womyn & BatGrrrls!! Kudos also to Norma Jones own superheroes video featured at NCA Currents!

There's something different about the new Ultimate universe Spidey

So what’s melting the internet this week? No doubt it is news that the death of Peter Parker in Marvel’s Ultimate (alternate timeline) universe will herald the introduction of a new Spider-Man…  Miles Morales, a half-African American and half-Hispanic teenager.  Needless to say, the “controversy” swings from wondering if this new ‘ethnic‘ Spidey is a “cop-out” or is instead symptomatic of a gay Liberal agenda (read about the freak-outs by a few of the usual suspects like Glenn Beck and Stephen Colbert). The “Big Two” DC and Marvel certainly take a lot of heat for their spotty track-record with diversity, but seem to get more right than Hollywood by most accounts.

National Public Radio commentator John Ridley critiques Hollywood for being even less diverse than the Big Two when it comes to diversity in lead characters, and demolishes their blame-the-audience theory that white people won’t go to see a movie with a black lead by pointing to a study by Indiana University professor Andrew Weaver: “Weaver found that white audiences tended to be racially selective with regard to romantic movies, but not necessarily when it came to other genres. So, sorry, Hollywood. You can’t blame it on the ticket buyers.”

You can listen to an interview with Mavel Comics Editor-in-Chief Axel Alonso at NPR about the new Spidey.

Meanwhile, in other superhero news, a first look at Christopher Nolan’s vision of Superman, and leaked pics of Bane and Catwoman from the Batman sequel, Alan Moore defends alleged Wikileaks whistleblower Bradley Manning, and Grant Morrison talks about his plans for Action Comics, and Anonymous threatens to “kill” Facebook!

Henry Cavill as 'The Man of Steel'

Posted by: Doc T | July 14, 2011

Mythic Rhetoric of Superheroes returns…

Captain America readies for his big screen debut

The MYTHIC RHETORIC OF SUPERHEROES course (Comm 4849 Special Topics in Rhetoric, TuTh 9:30-10:50a) is coming back to UNT this fall! Tell your friends and register soon, seats go fast!

2011’s superhero summer continues as Captain America prepares for international release (and, somewhat surprisingly, only has its title changed in 3 countries) and the Spider-Man reboot generates buzz. In other comics news, the Dallas Cowboys get some Marvel Superhero support, the naked-when-not-invisible superheroine finds her answer in the Heroic Womanthology that is a kickstarter success story, the 2011 Harvey Award nominees are announced, and #ComicsDidAGoodThing storms Twitter.

Posted by: Doc T | June 24, 2011

DC Comics relaunch

Russia not amused by Red Army statue make-over

Around the web, superheroes have been in the news in a Russian monument make-over, some backlash over the superhero movie blitzkrieg, fanboy theatre in NYC, the death of the Marvel Ultimate Universe Spider-Man (sorta), Neil Gaiman gives an impassioned defense of Free Speech, and a last-minute Superman story switcheroo that keeps getting more bizarre. Meanwhile, comics legend Gene Colan passes.

The big news lighting up the fanboy blogosphere, however, is the unprecedented DC Comics Relaunch that intends to reboot their comics universe in September. By all accounts, this is no mere PR stunt or cosmetic “RetCon” being planned by DC, but rather a revamped business approach to comics storytelling. Says DC’s Dan Didio:

“This is a refocusing of the energies of the company into a way that really pushes the medium toward the widest and best audience possible. This isn’t about turning around a single character or telling a new story. This is about repositioning the company for the future. What we’re trying to accomplish is to widen the breadth of our stories and the appeal of characters and go after different distribution systems.”

The new DC 52 seems partial to collars.

The last bit on the controversy around digital comics formats spurred a lot of reactions from creators and retailers (I’m eagerly awaiting MoreFun Tim’s take). Comics fandom also expressed anxiety over the changes to characters like Barbara Gordon a.k.a. Batgirl/Oracle and other favorite characters (you can see a break-down here). This shake-up at DC is creating a tsunami of ripples throughout the comics industry, and we’ll be keeping an eye on developments.

Posted by: Doc T | May 26, 2011

X-Men as Militarism Propaganda?

Blitzkrieg for X-MEN FIRST CLASS

A troubling article at SALON examines the functions of the new film X-MEN: FIRST CLASS as Pentagon propaganda, raising some fairly disturbing connections between Hollywood superheroes and the glorification of American militarism. While this trend of increasing “militainment” is not new, and post-9/11 American consciousness seems to have embraced the Superhero Zeitgeist, it should give us pause to reflect on the mythic payoff and price of such moralizing melodramas of redemptive violence (and identity politics) when they deny or deflect the harsh realities of both present and past.

Posted by: Doc T | May 19, 2011

The Invisible Whiteness of Being… a Superhero

‘Post-Racial’ Politics of The Green Lantern Corp?

As one entry on the Green Lantern Corps smirks: Space isn’t as dark as you think it is. Indeed, a very interesting American Prospect article on “Masked Identity Politics” similarly opens with a provocative rhetorical question about the upcoming Green Lantern film: “In a world with billions of people, what are the chances that the ring’s next owner is a white American dude? Pretty high, apparently.” Although the article goes on to note the 1960s hit-and-miss social consciousness of the comics, its pretty clear that an interplanetary (and inter-species) group like the GLC raises interesting questions about the racial politics of American superheroes. As Marc Singer explains in his essay “Black Skins and White Masks“:

“Comics rely upon visually codified representations in which characters are continually reduced to their appearances, and this reductionism is especially prevalent in superhero comics, whose characters are wholly externalized into their heroic costumes and aliases. This system of visual typology combines with the superhero genre’s long history of excluding, trivializing, or ‘tokenizing’ minorities to create numeorus minority superheroes who are marked purely for their race: ‘Black Lightning,’ ‘Black Panther,’ and so forth. The potential for superficiality and stereotyping here is dangerously high…”

As we have explored in this blog numerous times already, minority superheroes face several problems and paradoxes in their historically shaped media representations aside from even overt racism. Recently, the casting of British actor Idris Elba as a Norse God in THOR sparked racist backlash and controversy. And just this week, Prof. Cornell West’s stinging critique of President Obama’s NeoLiberal policies further stoked examinations of Identity Politics.

Heimdall knows: Midgardian haters gonna hate…

What remains to be seen, however, is how the conversations to follow seek to address or avoid the invisibility of White Privilege and the Colorblind Politics of Racial NeoLiberalism. As Kenneth Burke reminds us: “It is a principle of drama that the nature of acts and agents should be consistent with the nature of the scene.” More fodder for thought can be found in the infographic Superhero Movies By The Numbers.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 45 other followers